Abundance on Trial: The Cultural Significance of “Sustainability”

Joshua J. Yates

Editor's introduction: The Hedgehog Review, a journal published by the Institute for Advanced Studies in Culture at the University of Virginia, has devoted its summer 2012 issue to the theme "Sustain-Ability?" The lead article, "Abundance on Trial: The Cultural Significance of 'Sustainability,'” describes the rise of sustainability as "a master term" in our culture. Author Joshua J. Yates gives a clear overview of the movement: its history; its adoption by governments, companies, and universities; and its politicization. Dr. Yates considers the value systems behind the trend and asks whether, for instance, the values of Western civilization are inherently opposed to sustainability. He argues that the sustainability movement represents a "growing uncertainty over whether the relationship between humans and nature is one primarily defined by scarcity or abundance."

The National Association of Scholars studies ideological trends in campus culture and college curricula, and we have been paying close attention to the sustainability movement. We come to different conclusions from those of Dr. Yates as to the benefits of embracing sustainability, but in many points we agree. Sustainability has become a master term and it does reflect a cultural questioning of the traditional idea of “progress.” Colleges and universities have been swift to reorient themselves around sustainability education and initiatives. It has become, as Dr. Yates puts it, a “core organizing principle." 

NAS reprints an excerpt of his article here with the permission of The Hedgehog Review. The entire article is available at its website here.
 

Every now and then a single word emerges from our common parlance to achieve the status of a master term. Such a word gives expression to discrete needs and purposes, but it also provides a perspicuous lens through which to view the ethical disposition and emotional temper of a culture at a particular moment in time. The argument of this essay is that “sustainability” has become just such a word for our moment, deserving closer attention than it has so far received.

This essay seeks to address a set of neglected questions about the cultural significance of sustainability’s rise to a master term in our society and to distill its deeper moral and ethical salience from the wide spectrum of its connotations and applications. We will see how varying concerns over what Americans (and humans more generally) are not presently sustaining reflect a deep-seated anxiety that goes to the very heart of our most basic assumptions about what it means and takes to thrive in the contemporary world. Specifically, we will see how such assumptions are themselves connected to growing uncertainty over whether the relationship between humans and nature is one primarily defined by scarcity or abundance. In light of these anxieties and uncertainties, we will also see how the rise of sustainability to a master term represents accumulating disappointment and disillusionment with those key terms once believed constitutive of modern progress—terms like “development,” “improvement,” and “growth.” The cultural significance of sustainability, in other words, is related to the mounting scrutiny and doubt now facing the master terms of modern progress.

How “Sustainability” Became a Word for Our Time

In the summer of 2011, two separate but well-publicized reports by climate scientists issued global calls for sustainability. “The Stockholm Memorandum,” put forward by a group of Nobel Laureates who might well be expected to champion the cause of sustainability, contended: “we are the first generation facing the evidence of global change. It therefore falls upon us to change our relationship with the planet, in order to tip the scales towards a sustainable world for future generations.”2 Similarly, in a report commissioned by the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy of Sciences, “Fate of Mountain Glaciers in the Anthropocene,” a perhaps unexpected champion of sustainability called on all the peoples and nations of the world to “protect the habitat that sustains us.”3

They are not alone. Today, there are thousands of organizations across the planet dedicated to the cause of sustainability in one realm or another. The range of advocacy and application is remarkable, including everything from sustainable economic development to sustainable architectural design and city planning, fashion and apparel, energy, farming, education, healthcare, and so on. As the Nobel Laureate and Vatican reports suggest, the range of constituencies promoting sustainability is equally remarkable. Before we can properly engage the cultural significance of sustainability, it is necessary to develop a fuller picture of how the language of sustainability has become so pervasive.

Read the full article in the Hedgehog Review at www.iasc-culture.org >

  • Share

Most Commented

September 16, 2019

Slavery Did Not Make America Rich

'King Cotton' isn't King

September 18, 2019

Most Read

January 03, 2011

May 26, 2010