Penn v. Wax: Closing Arguments

National Association of Scholars

Editor’s Note: The two documents to which we link in the buttons below contain the closing argument and slideshow presented by Professor Amy Wax’s counsel during disciplinary proceedings.


The University of Pennsylvania’s (Penn) proceedings are intended to seek and impose “major sanctions” as a consequence of Wax’s speech. The proceedings were requested by the dean of Penn’s Carey Law School, Theodore Ruger, in 2022. Dean Ruger alleges that Professor Wax has made inflammatory comments, among other similar complaints pertaining to university policies. Almost all cited examples of speech included in his complaint, as well as verifiable testimony provided by the university, are statements made by Professor Wax in public venues, not in class.

Wax’s public speech has included statements on race, culture, and justice. Such discussions, regardless of venue or taboo, are necessary. The winning arguments of these debates have real-world policy effects.

Academic freedom ought to protect such speech, and to ensure that it does have a place on campus. Sadly, Wax had to seek venues off campus in order to have important discussions of national interest.

It is our view, and has been our view, that Professor Wax’s public statements do not rise to the level of “major sanctions.” Moreover, her bravery to engage in such controversial conversations should be encouraged. It is the very reason we awarded Professor Wax with the Peter Shaw Memorial Award in 2018.

DOWNLOAD THE CLOSING ARGUMENT

DOWNLOAD THE POWERPOINT


Photo by WestCoastivieS - Own work, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=31626928

  • Share

Most Commented

March 24, 2025

1.

A Reckoning for Higher Education?

Are American colleges and universities finally getting their comeuppance?...

March 31, 2025

2.

Keeping Watch

Columbia's descent into chaos is by its own hand. Actions to right the university must be swift and tough....

January 27, 2025

3.

Exclusive Documents: UC-Boulder Breaks Civil Rights Law to Advance Racial Preferences

New FOIA documents grant a window into how the University of Colorado-Boulder, in the name of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, discriminates on the basis of protected class and upholds a co......

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

April 15, 2025

2.

Fighting Harvard and the Other Cultural Warlords

The academic bureaucracies and professoriate are so deeply committed to their radical program of replacing American society with their own vision of a new order that we have no real choice b......

October 12, 2010

3.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...