Student Activists and College Administrators: Now as Then

Glenn Ricketts

It’s always fun to find something forgotten – and hence, re-discovered – when you re-arrange your bookshelves, as I did recently.  Thus, I stumbled upon The Politics of Disorder written in 1971 by political scientist Theodore Lowi, then at the University of Chicago.  Part of the “disorders” viewed through Lowi’s historical lens were the widespread violence and disruptions on college campuses perpetrated by radical student groups, especially at elite institutions, from Harvard to Berkeley.  Lowi examines why this might have happened as it did, but more interestingly asks why it was allowed to happen.  His answer hasn’t aged at all: 

Liberals in the university have no problem handling demands that originate from their right. This helps explain why outside threats are no longer so menacing.  Conservative forces inside academia are also dealt with firmly.  If a delegation of students were to call on a social science department chairman to demand a better presentation of Christianity, they would be sent away with a firm lecture on the evils of interfering with who teaches what.  This is not to say that every conservative demand is rejected outright.  Conservatives are dealt with rationally, and with restraint.

Demands that issue from the left, however, are an entirely different matter.  The liberal, after years of identifying with the left, quite frankly cannot distinguish a good demand from a bad one.  He is ready to abandon organized knowledge itself if that seems to be the only manner of proving that  no one can outlib him, for the voices of the left remove his bearings.  The liberal in academia faces right with forthrightness and honesty.  He faces left with hypocrisy. 

Those words, as noted above, appeared in 1971.  But aside from the fact that we’re all older and the demonstrators of that era now run the academy, the passage seems wholly contemporary.  Have a look, for example, at the recent events at Swarthmore College. Somehow, I can’t imagine that the administration there would have non-responded as it did if the demonstrators had been opponents of same-sex marriage or staged an anti-affirmative action bake sale.  Now as then, you could say, with the possible difference that present-day conservative students on campus are numerically fewer and get much rougher handling than their counterparts did in 1971.

  • Share

Most Commented

September 6, 2024

1.

Professor Alleges "Widespread" Discriminatory Hiring Coverup at University of Washington

Audio acquired by the National Association of Scholars describes allegations of coverup race-based hiring coverup at the University of Washington...

October 29, 2024

2.

The Looming Irrelevance of Middle East Study Centers

Today’s Middle Eastern Studies Centers are facing a crisis due to the winds of change in the Middle East and their own ideological echo chamber....

September 25, 2024

3.

NAS Statement on University of Pennsylvania Sanction of Amy Wax

The National Association of Scholars is outraged—but not surprised—by Penn's decision to penalize Wax for exercising her academic freedom. ...

Most Read

May 15, 2015

1.

Where Did We Get the Idea That Only White People Can Be Racist?

A look at the double standard that has arisen regarding racism, illustrated recently by the reaction to a black professor's biased comments on Twitter....

October 12, 2010

2.

Ask a Scholar: What is the True Definition of Latino?

What does it mean to be Latino? Are only Latin American people Latino, or does the term apply to anyone whose language derived from Latin?...

September 21, 2010

3.

Ask a Scholar: What Does YHWH Elohim Mean?

A reader asks, "If Elohim refers to multiple 'gods,' then Yhwh Elohim really means Lord of Gods...the one of many, right?" A Hebrew expert answers....